User talk:Wiki-vr

nice maps you provide

Hi Wiki-vr,
i am a (mostly) german wikipedia reader/user. I am really interested from where you receive these nice maps, is there eventually a sort of map generator? Please leave me a note here or at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Murmeltier
Greetings Murmeltier

–> Antwort bei Murmeltier –Wiki-vr 17:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi wiki-vr, danke für die Post. Leider habe ich keine Ahnung was 'Mac Bibliotheken' sind event. reallife oder virtuell??) Kommt man da ran, mir gefällt der Kartenstil nämlich sehr. In der Commons habe ich auch schon gesucht, dort ist im Moment aber nur ein "incomplete license" Verweis, siehe [1]. Kannst du das noch ergänzen sonst werden die Dinger noch gelöscht...

Lizenz: Ich werde mich bemühen, sollte es noch keine gute Seele getan haben... wiki-vr 18:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see the blank map, but how are you coloring the countries. BTW I like your work. Cheers! --Scaife 19:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The bitmap editors have a "bucket" function, replacing a color within a boundary with a selected one, e.g. with the "pipette" function. One of the programs which (almost:-) anyone can pay for is GraphicConverter. There are a couple of others for PCs as well (see bitmap editor). Hope this may help:-) wiki-vr 18:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Swiss flag, CoA, color

Help with svg version

of Image:Switzerland coat of arms.png

Hi, I've noticed that folks (e.g. Li-sung) on cs.wiki began replacing png images with svg ones. Could you help me with creating an svg version of Image:Switzerland coat of arms.png ? Would be based on your Image:Confoederatio Helvetica-coat.svg but the cross is some 90% of the one in your image, so it appears as I am used to over here in Switzerland – compare e.g. Švýcarsko and [2])?
Thanks, best regards, wiki-vr 21:58, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and made Image:Confoederatio Helvetica-coat.svg look much more like Image:Switzerland coat of arms.png. It does look better, and if you live in Switzerland you would certainly know what is more accurate better than I would. :) If you happen to know the average color used for the red, that would be very useful. ¦ Reisio 23:45, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

–> r e p l y

"Swiss" red

PS - I have found out, by asking around, that there is not one Swiss red... wiki-vr 12:55, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, I was just curious if there was a particular hue of red you came across more often than any others. ¦ Reisio 13:02, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A particular hue of red you came across more often than any others? Oh yes, that's simply the simple bright red one, all other are much less used. –wiki-vr 14:07, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

coat of arms, again

User:E Pluribus Anthony has altered me to the presence of a federal resolution which includes a drawing of what I understand is what the general shape of the Swiss coat of arms should look like. It's the shape of the old (original) image I made, so I've reverted back to that. I realize that it's probably not the most prevalent shape, but it's apparently official, so Wikipedia should use it.

Check it out in: French German Italian.

The images being used now, btw, are Image:Flag of Switzerland.svg and Image:Coat of Arms of Switzerland.svg as part of a compromise. ¦ Reisio 13:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great & thanks! However, the shape as pictured is just to illustrate the words, it is not binding,-) wiki-vr 15:17, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Msg from COA

Great! The full text is here, is really big, but it's not necessary to traslate it all; I'm only looking for little additional information. If you can help me traslating about 10% of it, I'll be very glad! Thanks again, and you can ask me for help anytime you want! --COA 23:09, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Již v roce 1986 vznikla ve struktuře Policejního ředitelství Buenos Aires Brigáda pro zvláštní operace - Sokol (BRIGADA ESPECIAL OPERATIVA HALCON /Policista 11/97/), která se měla podílet nejen na potlačování mezinárodního terorismu a jeho aktivit v Argentině, ale i na boji proti nebezpečným pachatelům. Vlastně je připravena kdykoliv a kdekoliv podat pomocnou ruku nebo pouze taktickou radu policistů při řešení nezvyklých taktických situacích. Struktura velitelství je následující - brigádě velí tzv. komisař, jenž je podřízen policejnímu velitelovi, přičemž komisař odpovídá mimo jiné i za výcvik a i nábor. Přičemž je základní výcvik rozdělen do třech fází po dvou měsících, v nichž je zahrnut i jakýsi výběrový kurs a zkouška vhodnosti kandidáta. Nakonec jsou takto vycvičení muži, experti v protiteroristickém boji, výsadkářství, potápění a bojovém umění, začleněni do jednoho z pěti bojových týmů po 15 mužích. Každý tým tvoří svým početním zastoupením samostatnou jednotku zahrnující mimo jiné odstřelovače nebo i vyjednávače, přičemž v případě potřeby může být celá brigáda nasazena jako velká intervenční skupina. Kromě své hlavní role plní jako jiné obdobné jednotky i úkoly ochrany VIP, hlavně státních návštěv. Členové této jednotky, jenž soustřeďuje nejlepší bojovníky v Argentině, udržuje úzské pracovní styky s jinými speciálními jednotky ve světě, převážně v USA, o nichž již byla v tomto volném seriálu řeč (LAPD SWAT, FBI HRT, DEA atd.) Další argentinskou policejní zvláštní jednotku je SECCION DE FUERZAS ESPECIALES (SFE) pocházejicíc zargentinského četnictva neboli GENDARMERIA NACIONAL. Stejně jak v případě Francie (GIGN a RAID), Itálie (GIS a NOCS) a mnoho dalších, kde vedle sebe existuje jak policie, tak i četnictvo, i zde je tato zvláštní jednotka určena pro akce na venkově a neobydlených částí, oproti jednotce HALCON, jenž je určena pro akce ve městech a jejich okolí. SFE je podřízena Ministerstvu obrany a byla založena v roce 1986, v roce kdy v příhraničních operacích byli náznaky o působení teroristů Hizballáhu v souvislosti s drogami jako výnosným zdrojem financí. Její úkoly se tak rozšířili na protiteroristické operace, akce v džungli, hloubkový průzkum, obojživelné akce ale i vrtulníkové výsadky. Kromě toho může v případě větších operacích spolupracovat, nebo podporovat, Brigádu pro zvláštní operace Sokol. Proto byli také její příslušníci vysláni na stáž k francouzské GIGN, jenž v poslední době proslula záchranou rukojmích z letadla A300 AIRBUS v Marseille v prosinci 1994, kromě toho udržuje SECCION DE FUERZAS ESPECIALES úzké kontakty se španělskými kolegy z GEO /Policista 11/96/. Aby se argentinský policista-četník dostal do této 44členné jednotky musí nejprve dosáhnout hodnosti seržanta a odsloužit 5 let služby, samozřejmě, že musí mít výbornou fyzickou kondici a projít baterií psychologických a fyzických testů. Sem spadá jak plavecký test, tak i běh a střelba a další. Následný výcvik probíhá po 6 měsících a je rozdělena do dvou (tříměsíční) etap, zde je vedle nám již známých odborných znalostí zařazen i výsadkářský výcvik. Po tomto půl roce, jehož konce se dočká pouze 20% uchazečů o službu, ale ani tady vše nekončí, následuje 8měsíční zkušební doba, během níž má každý nový adept přiděleno instruktora z řad starších příslušníků jednotky. Jednotka o síle 44 mužů je rozdělena do tvou operačních sekcí, z nichž každá se dále dělí na dvě skupiny (GRUPO DE INTERVENCION), které zase tvoří dva operační týmy. V pohotovosti je 24 hodin připravena k akci 22členná sekce, včetně dvou odstřelovačů a případně dalšího speciálního personálu, včetně pyrotechnického oddílu GEDEX. Tento systém umožňuje do 24 hodin zasáhnout jednotce z její základny v Ezezie kdekoliv v zemi. V souvislosti s nárustem projevů terorismu v Argentině (útoky na židovské představitele) je plánováno zvýšení početního stavu jednotky, který by měl dosáhnout čísla 100. Jejich výzbroj je velmi rozmanitá, vzhledem k specifickým úkolům, od pistole SIG Sauer P 226, samopalu HK MP5 a jeho mnoha z verzí, až po odstřelovací pušky SIG Sauer SSG 2000.

Good idea. Thanks, anyway. --COA 01:00, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

listed for deletion

Image:Hungary-coa.jpg

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Hungary-coa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Wikics template

Hi Wiki-vr! I've just created a new template to indicate English Wikipedia users who also contribute to the Czech Wikipedia.
Template:User wikics
Feel free to add it to your userboxes if you like it. Happy Easter. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 08:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It was a very good idea to use that category. Thanks! Anyway, do you know how to have the users in the category listed by their user name instead of having them all under "U" ("User")? If you do, please change it in the template for me. If you don't, I'll ask an administrator. Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 18:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniel! I'll try to find out, too. If you do so before (good idea: by asking an administrator, as you wrote) kindly let me know. wiki-vr 11:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: Found out, by looking up in the code of other templates – see changes in your template. :-) wiki-vr 11:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Daniel Šebesta (talk • contribs) 12:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

I see no one has yet welcomed you, so Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Wiki-vr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Brian 11:26, 24 June 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

Thanks, Brian! wiki-vr 11:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Radius ant1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Radius ant1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:IND-DEM logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:IND-DEM logo.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aljazeeralogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aljazeeralogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EU in lists

There's a central discussion at Talk:European Union/inclusion in lists of countries now. Please state your opinion; thanks! —Nightstallion 09:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll have a look at it, occasionaly. Ok? wiki-vr 07:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Meanwhile a link to an NZZ article what EU is about (definitely not a state (yet)), in German Ein «multioptionaler» europäischer Verfassungsvertrag, NZZ, 31. März 2007 wiki-vr 09:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

When creating redirect pages, please remember to use the correct formatting: #REDIRECT [[Article to redirect to]]. I've noticed in a few edits of yours that you've put a space between the hash sign (#) and the word "REDIRECT". Not a big problem, but I thought I'd bring it to your attention. Keep up the good work though! Booglamay (talk) 10:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Booglamay, thank you for this, somehow the blank slipped in. All the best to you too! wiki-vr (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Nobel icon

Template:Nobel icon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Utternutter (talk) 21:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Borat movie.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Borat movie.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:SBB-CFF-FFS logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:SBB-CFF-FFS logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Wiki-vr! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 232 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Peter Sain ley Berry - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Peter Sain ley Berry

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Peter Sain ley Berry. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Sain ley Berry. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Business-to-consumer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Business-to-consumer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business-to-consumer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 11:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited European Citizens' Initiative, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One of Us (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fairphone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagesschau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of rowing clubs in Switzerland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rowing clubs in Switzerland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rowing clubs in Switzerland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SCSAA

The article SCSAA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A disambiguation page with only redlinks and except for this page "SCSAA" does not appear in Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 20:00, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Independent expert group" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Independent expert group. Since you had some involvement with the Independent expert group redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jos Verhulst

The article Jos Verhulst has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional biography. Grandiose claims of notability - but zero cites. A WP:BEFORE shows minimal media coverage, even in Dutch. The nl:wp version of the article is similarly uncited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 09:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cs-timeline-sk

Template:Cs-timeline-sk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Web-safe" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Web-safe and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 2#Web-safe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]